What if Jesus walked into your town?

Jesus in Your Town
While this question is one that could occupy a conversation for a few hours. What I wonder if it a worthy enough question to challenge us to reevaluate the way that we go about the practice of our faith. The clip below is from a movie called “Joshua”. This is a play on the fact that Jesus’ name is derived from the older Jewish name of Joshua. So the essence of the movie is this: If Jesus walked into town what would He do? How would He act? What would be the response of the people? This is one of the best modern adaptations of the life of Jesus I have ever come across. (I don’t mean to overstate the movie.)

There is one scene in particular that gets me every time. Joshua comes across a camp meeting and walks in just as the evangelist is about the pray. Joshua doesn’t join in. He actually interrupts the meeting and causes a scene. The evangelist is dumbstruck. He doesn’t know what to do. Joshua tells him, “You know, you don’t have to do it this way.” Joshua tells him, “I know you’d like to have the faith to talk to these people. But you don’t know what faith is.”

While the caricature is awful, the perception that it portrays is not that far off the mark. This is how many in the world view the church and it’s bag of “party tricks”. Some charlatans bilking the faithful for their own gain. Others teaching doctrines that are not sound and therefore misleading those hungry for God, His presence and power in their lives. But the clip provides a couple of twists. First, Joshua reveals that the true intention of the evangelist (in this case) is to do what is right. He genuinely desires to help those that have come to the meeting. But he doesn’t know what or how he is supposed to do it. The second is that Joshua speaks the truth and it activates the faith of the people. The truth creates an awkward scene, but a healing actually takes place.

The Cost of Healing on the Healer
This is one of the best depictions of what Jesus’ miracles of healing must have looked like. The transfer of divine power through the human agent is an awesome burden. It has helped to see why Jesus spent so much time praying. It cost Him so much to heal those that were hurting. Healing wasn’t easy because it taxed the limits of the human experience. Jesus accepted the cost of not only bring our salvation through his death, but He also accepted the personal, physical and spiritual cost of touching those around Him with the power of God’s mercy.

This scene in particular reminds me of the woman with the hemorrhage problem in Mark 5:25-34. The story tells us that Jesus “perceiv[ed] in Himself that power had gone out from Him.” I don’t know what that must have looked like, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it was something like it is shown here.

Easter 2010 (Pt. 3) | “Woman, behold, your son!”

Easter 2010 Meditations

The Third Word

²⁵but standing by the cross of Jesus were his mother and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. ²⁶When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, “Woman, behold, your son!” ²⁷Then he said to the disciple, “Behold, your mother!” And from that hour the disciple took her to his own home. (John 19:25-27)

Meditation on the Third Word

Of all the words that Jesus spoke that afternoon this is the one that stands juxtaposed against the others. In the midst of all the suffering and pain that was being experienced and seen, none could have been more devastated than Mary, Jesus’ mother. Mary, was the beneficiary of the single greatest revelation of God that God has ever given. It was to Mary that the Messiah was sent. And it was from Mary that the Messiah that was conceived in her womb and born. And even now as Jesus is dying He thinks of her and entrusts her into the hands of his dear friend John. Jesus’ exemplifies for us that our earthly responsibilities are not something to be dismissed as life draws to a close. Have you thought of your family and friends in light of your mortality? What would you have them remember? Jesus loved Mary to the end.

The Problem with Pluralism

The Elephant Problem

I was reading an article by Dr. Timothy Keller, pastor of Redeemer Presbyterian Church in Manhattan, New York. In the article, Dr. Keller explains why Christians need to be clear that Christianity is not one option among many. Pluralism is the belief that there is more than one way of looking at something. This can also be made more specific within a religious context, hence – Religious Pluralism. Religious Pluralism is a loosely defined expression concerning acceptance of different religions. The problem with this idea is that it assumes that all religions and points of view are equally valid even if they contradict one another. This simply cannot be the case.

The point that Dr. Keller highlights is that people resort to pluralism for the sake of tolerance and inclusion. This leads to weak critical thinking about the real differences that all religions have with other religions. Dr. Keller gives an analogy that is commonly used to undermine the unique claims of Christianity.

A common analogy is cited—the blind men trying to describe an elephant. One feels the tail and reports that an elephant is thin and flexible. Another feels a leg and claims the animal is thick as a tree. Another touches its side and reports the elephant is like a wall. This is supposed to represent how the various religions only understand part of God, while no one can truly see the whole picture. To claim full knowledge of God, pluralists contend, is arrogance.

I occasionally tell this parable, and I can almost see the people nodding their heads in agreement. But then I remind them, “The only way this parable makes any sense, however, is if you’ve seen a whole elephant. Therefore, the minute you say, ‘All religions only see part of the truth,’ you are claiming the very knowledge you say no one else has. And you are demonstrating the same spiritual arrogance you accuse Christians of.” [emphasis added]

One of the reasons that this analogy “makes sense” is because it appeals to our own ignorance. We don’t know everything, so how can any religion claim to have an exclusive claim on religious truth. But the problem with this is that when we start with humans we will always get flawed results. It is when we start with God that truth and freedom come [John 8:32].

The heart of pluralism and the analogy of the elephant hinges on the idea that it is more intellectually honest and social generous to give room for all points of view. This, in the end, can only lead to chaos. Pluralism claims in an absolute way that all points of view are valid, but it is itself an outright rejection of any absolute standard of truth. So pluralism has to accept as a valid point the rejection of pluralism as a standard of evaluating truth claims. What happens is that the caveat of tolerance is attached to keep people who believe in absolute truth from defending that position.

The Christian Response to Pluralism

So how does Christianity answer the claims of Pluralism? The Doctrine of the Incarnation is the challenge that the God of the Bible levies against every religion. When we talk about Jesus of Nazareth we have to recognize that we are talking about God in the flesh. We are talking about God who was, and is, and is to come; that God has come down out of His holy heaven and chosen to live among us. John 1:14 says that the Word “dwelt” among us. That word literally means that God has pitched His tent with us.

God, for the first time in God’s existence, understood the human experience. That is why the writer of Hebrews does not say that God empathizes with us, as someone looking in, but that in Jesus God sympathizes with us, as someone looking out [Hebrews 4:15]. Look at Paul’s inclusion of an early hymn of the church to the believers at Philippi to help future believers understand what Jesus did in coming to Earth:

⁵Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, ⁶who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, ⁷but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. ⁸And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. [Philippians 2:5-8 ESV, emphasis added]

Then in Colossi Paul makes this remarkable statement about what God was doing in the person of Jesus.

⁹For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily, ¹⁰and you have been filled in him, who is the head of all rule and authority. [Colossians 2:9-10 ESV, emphasis added]

In the Doctrine of the Incarnation Jesus Christ, the God-man is fulfilling the law which God gave the world [Matthew 5:17]. Peter also contributes to the discussion of the ministry that Christ achieved in the Incarnation.

²¹For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, so that you might follow in his steps. ²²He committed no sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth. ²³When he was reviled, he did not revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten but continued entrusting himself to him who judges justly. ²⁴He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds, you have been healed. [1 Peter 2:21-24 ESV, emphasis added]

Every Religion has Points of Exclusion

So how do we counter the challenge that is brought against Jesus and the exclusive claims of Christianity? The difficulty with pluralistic thinking, as it relates to religion, is that it lends itself to the assumption that all religions are trying to achieve the same goal. The religions of Christianity, Judaism and Islam do, in a sense, strive for a paradise of some kind. This they share. But Buddhism, does not. Buddhism is a means of escaping from this world through enlightenment. And that is just one example. This and similar eastern religions seek to escape this world of toil not for a paradise, but into nothingness; to be absorbed into the ultimate.

What we, as Christians, must contend with is that every religion has a point of exclusion. That is, there is a point at which the ultimate purpose of the religion deviates from all others. Every philosophy, ideology, and system of thought have these points of exclusion. This is the point where two systems collide and are irreconcilable. It is at these points, and not at those where some commonality is shared that religions must be evaluated.

When compared to other religions Christianity is the only one that does not seek to make man into a divine being. Will man be transformed to reflect Jesus Christ? Yes, but we will not become of the same essence as God. In Christ, we find that God has condescended from heaven and entered into the human drama. In doing so, the unthinkable has happened. God has become one of us. Because of this exclusive assertion, Christianity stands alone. Also, the implicit absurdity of the Incarnation lends itself to legitimacy because it requires the very faith that the Scriptures expects as the means to eternal life.

³This is good, and it is pleasing in the sight of God our Savior, ⁴ who desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. ⁵For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, ⁶who gave himself as a ransom for all, which is the testimony given at the proper time. [1Timothy 2:3-6 ESV, emphasis added]

The Problem with Pluralism is that it seeks to undermine the truth of God’s word. The solution will be found only in the person and work of Jesus the Christ.

What is the Gospel? (Pt. 5) – “The Remedy Delivered (Pt. 1)”

This is part of the series What is the Gospel?

One of the most wonderful aspects of Christianity is that God is not far off. God is not so distant that He cannot be known. God is not so mysterious that He cannot be found. It is the one of the greater wonders of the Christian faith that God has come down to earth and made abode with humanity. The doctrine of the Incarnation is relevant to the Gospel because it speaks to the seriousness of the sin. Only God could resolve and reconcile the broken relationship between humanity and God; and the broken relationship between humanity and itself. John captures it so beautifully when he said that, “the Word became flesh and dwelt among us” (John 1:14). God has literally pitched His tent in our midst and has condescended so that we may have access to Him. Peter Lewis in his book The Glory of Christ makes these powerful statements about Jesus being delivered through Mary’s womb.

“If this humanity is less than full and true, then He is inadequate as a mediator; incompetent as a sympathizer; and disqualified as a redeemer. If (save for sin) He is not all that we are in our uttermost humanity, then He cannot perfectly represent us either in His life or in His death. If He does not descend to us from God, then He cannot lift us up to God.…it is in the Humanity of Jesus that we encounter the nearness of God” (pg. 142, 143)

The Gospel message makes no sense if the Savior is not like the sinner. Only one who is like us can stand as an advocate, as a representative and plead for salvation on our behalf. And so we are confronted with the Incarnation and its importance to the Gospel message that Jesus had to become like us so that we could become like He is.

The Cross of Christ

There is within each of us a tendency to draw our attention inward. We are surrounded by a multitude of stimuli. Each voice calling us to become so immersed in our own perceptions and experiences that we have to work to consciously lay them aside to even try and connect to something other.

As I think of the cross of Christ I am confounded by the truth that Jesus exited heaven so that He could experience earth. Jesus relinquished eternal authority so that He could resurrect human frailty. Because of the chasm that exists between the world and the highest heaven, we find the bridge of divine love, built by God Himself. And it is Jesus alone who demonstrates the quality of life qualified to journey across its breadth.

Christ exemplifies the seriousness and determination required to lay aside what is familiar and comfortable for that which is foreign and burdensome. As I consider His example I utter this prayer:

Oh that I may follow in that line and reach the shores of glory; to hear the voice of God as he speaks, “Well done!” Amen.

Last Updated on February 10, 2023.